1. UberPeople.NET - Independent community of rideshare drivers. It's FREE to be a person and enjoy all the benefits of membership. Sign-up HERE!

Nissan’s Path to Self-Driving Cars? Humans in Call Centers

Discussion in 'Autonomous' started by WeirdBob, Jan 8, 2017.

  1. WeirdBob

    WeirdBob Well-Known Member

    Nissan’s Path to Self-Driving Cars? Humans in Call Centers

    Nissan says driverless cars will never match human skills—so it's using humans to back them up.


    Alex Davies | Transportation | 01.05.17 | 7:00 pm

    “This is it!” Maarten Sierhuis says. “I mean, look at this.” He points to a photo of road construction at an intersection in Sunnyvale, California, near Nissan’s Silicon Valley research center, which Sierhuis runs. A line of cones shunts traffic to the left side of the double yellow line. The light is red. A worker holds a “Slow” sign. It’s the sort of seemingly unremarkable situation that can trigger convulsions in the brain of an autonomous vehicle.

    “There is so much cognition that you need here,” Sierhuis says. The driver—or the car—has to interpret the placement of the cones and the behavior of the human worker to understand that in this case, it’s OK to drive through a red light on the wrong side of the road. “This is not gonna happen in the next five to ten years.”

    It’s a stunning admission, in its way: Nissan’s R&D chief believes the truly driverless car—something many carmakers and tech giants have promised to deliver within five years or fewer—is an unreachable short-term goal. Reality: one; robots: zero. Even a system that could handle 99 percent of driving situations will cause trouble for the company trying to promote, and make money off, the technology. “We will always need the human in the loop,” Sierhuis says.

    But Nissan has a solution: a call center with human meatbags ready to take command via remote control.
    . . .

    Now, Nissan’s cubicle-based drivers aren’t emergency backups. If the car hits black ice, it’s in charge of staying on the road. There’s no feasible way to get the human into the loop in time to act. But they can help out when the car encounters conditions it’s unsure how to handle. If a Nissan happened upon the construction scene from Sierhuis’ photo, it would stop and ping its control center. A human operator would look around using the car’s cameras and other sensors and issue new instructions—direct control would pose latency issues. Like: When it’s safe, cross the double yellow and get back to the right side after 20 yards. Or a new instruction set could ensure packages and disabled passengers get dropped off in exactly the right spot, and help assess potentially dangerous situations on the road. But most of all, the teleoperator is there to make sure the car’s doesn’t just shut down when it’s too dumb to know what’s going on.
    . . .​
    SibeRescueBrian likes this.
  2. Newwber

    Newwber Well-Known Member

    The CSR's from uber can transition into these roles with ease......
    SibeRescueBrian likes this.
  3. WeirdBob

    WeirdBob Well-Known Member

    By telling the car several hours later "We're sorry to hear about your problem. Please send us a PM via Facebook Messenger", then giving the car a command to do high speed doughnuts in reverse and marking it "Resolved"?
  4. RamzFanz

    RamzFanz Well-Known Member

    Saint Louis
    Please point out where they say this. Thanks.

    Also, Nissan is saying commercial production by 2020. I wouldn't want people to get the wrong idea.
  5. Jermin8r89

    Jermin8r89 Well-Known Member

    So have times changed. 60 years man go to moon. Now in 2017 "look ma robot thingy can do things better then me"

Share This Page